Does homegirl have a twin sister or something? Coz this can’t be her – I’m mean she looks like she’s gone up 5 cup sizes and her arms and legs don’t seem twiggy anymore - Kate doesn’t even wear sweatpants to walk the dog. That isn’t Jamers either, what is going on?
Perhaps he is her trainer (he does seem to shave his legs) and she’s working out for a movie – or is on a health kick. In any case she looks very fit and active right now (my apologies for sounding like the slag from the skinny website just then).
July 9, 2008 at 11:46 PM
That is not Bozzers.
July 9, 2008 at 11:57 PM
I know right? Since when did she have boobs? Her chest used to curve inwards.
July 10, 2008 at 12:07 AM
Yeah, and she used to be cute.
July 10, 2008 at 12:21 AM
rude
July 10, 2008 at 1:22 AM
You’re so mean!
… which reminds me. Everyone should read The Guardian’s review of Mamma Mia!. Very funny.
July 10, 2008 at 1:25 AM
I’m rude and mean now? I’m sorry!
July 10, 2008 at 1:32 AM
No, you’re rude and Jane is mean.
July 10, 2008 at 1:41 AM
Is this the review? It’s the review of a dang trailer! Hee!
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/film/2008/07/pickard_of_the_flicks_mamma_mi.html
“. . . and the other guy is so unremarkable he barely has a face.”
July 10, 2008 at 1:47 AM
This is the one I was talking about:
http://film.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/Critic_Review/Guardian_review/0,,2289839,00.html
I especially like his suggestion at then end about how “Fernando” could have been included.
July 10, 2008 at 2:02 AM
Why the phuck am I mean? This is one of the GD nicest posts I’ve ever written.
Ur such a troll.
July 10, 2008 at 2:33 AM
Janers, you’re not mean. I don’t think anyone really thinks that you are mean.
AC: That was damned entertaining. The trailer review was pretty funny too, though.
July 10, 2008 at 2:37 AM
So you don’t think saying something like…
“Since when did she have boobs? Her chest used to curve inwards.”
is even a little bit mean?
It was nothing more than an observation, though, meant to facilitate an elegant segue onto the subject of Mamma Mia! reviews in The Guardian. It’s not as if I can create new subjects on my own, you know.
July 10, 2008 at 2:47 AM
hyperbole – don’t take everything so seriously. Did u think the people who write this site were sugar and spice and all things nice or something?
July 10, 2008 at 2:55 AM
I have the distinct impression that you’re the one taking everything so seriously. It most certainly isn’t me. I’ve hardly written a single serious word in any of these comments.
July 10, 2008 at 3:09 AM
then y the phuck do u come here and say ‘oh ur so mean’ in a random post when every friggin post is mean?
Ur a troll – u come here to intentionally piss me off and it’s getting annoying.
July 10, 2008 at 3:22 AM
All right. In this comment I will be serious. The rest were all meant to be understood in a light-hearted tone which you’re apparently determined not to understand if written by me.
I had absolutely no intention of pissing you off – or anyone else for that matter.
I had just read that Mamma Mia! review. I found it funny. I wanted to share it with the world. (or some small subset of it)
I couldn’t create a new post for it, so I had to put it as a comment on something that was already here. So I basically said: “people here write snarky comments – here’s a review I found which is also snarky and I think you might enjoy reading it”.
That’s absolutely all there was to it.
You appear very, very determined to feel offended and I don’t suppose there’s much I can do about that. But your accusations against me are entirely false.
July 10, 2008 at 3:31 AM
bullshit – u pretty much only comment on my posts and it’s usually so u can whine about something or disagree with what I’ve said. I’m not offended by anything u said in this post but frustation has been building.
July 10, 2008 at 3:40 AM
I had no idea who had written this post when I made the comment. None whatsoever.
And I expressed no disagreement with anything or anyone.
I’m amazed by the thinness of your skin, though. I never expected anything like this in a million years…
Or maybe you’re pulling my leg? If that’s the case you certainly managed to fool me.
July 10, 2008 at 3:44 AM
I’m probably talking out of turn, given that this isn’t my blog, but Jane has got a point.
You probably don’t realise it AC, but you can be very antagonistic in your replies and they tend to be aimed at Jane’s posts. There is really no need to keep a convo going for days on end regarding a throw away remark about Mischa Barton’s thighs, for instance.
It really is not that serious, people come here to have fun, not to be lectured or to enter into cyber drama.
Apologies again, because this isn’t my blog, but I felt I should say something.
July 10, 2008 at 3:50 AM
I absolutely can be antagonistic and intentionally so in some cases.
My comments here were entirely innocent, though, as Anners seemed to understand well enough.
July 10, 2008 at 3:58 AM
What were we talking about again?
July 10, 2008 at 4:00 AM
Coming to someone’s blog and being intentionally antagonistic, is known as being a troll, I believe. You also appear to be pretty arrogant too.
I’m going to leave it there because as the Mischa Barton post illustrated, you appear to enjoy keeping disagreements going for days on end.
Furthermore, I’m moving on because this blog is Anners and Jane’s, and no one elses.
Which is something that you might want to bear in mind, AC.
July 10, 2008 at 4:00 AM
Thanks for having my back Malanthers.
AC I explained it wasn’t the comments in this post that set me off – ur commies on my posts always seem to be in disagreement but not so much on the other girl’s posts – It feels like there u’ve realised there are some things I feel strongly about and are just looking for an argument – whether it be over people bashing Mischa’s Barton’s thighs, whaling or the protection of children.
We come here to have fun and makes jokes not attack each other.
July 10, 2008 at 4:03 AM
@ Wanda – The fact that Katers has filled out a bit, and no longer looks like she is going to snap in half!
July 10, 2008 at 4:07 AM
@ Jane – No probs, I really enjoy this blog and appreciate the work that the three of you put into it. I just want to continue having my daily dose of cyber laughs.
Nothing more, nothing less.
July 10, 2008 at 4:23 AM
I prob did overeact a little – the people here bag each other out a lot, we all share the same sense of humour and understand each other’s sarcasm but AC’s comments are usually more serious so I didn’t realise she was talking in jest as well.
I’ve gotten pretty frustrated at some of our agruments and I was it set me off when I felt she was looking for another one.
July 10, 2008 at 4:36 AM
If I comment more on your posts (and I haven’t kept track of that, but I’ll take your word for it) then it’s probably because you’re the poster most likely to make bold declarations on topics I’ve actually got an opinion about as opposed to, say, if Kate Moss and Pete Doherty will ever get back together.
It takes at least two people to keep a long and possibly pointless argument going, though. But if you don’t want to continue a discussion with me just let me know and I’ll stop at once. That way you even get to have the final word.
July 10, 2008 at 5:42 AM
thats not the anorexic blonde.
July 10, 2008 at 9:51 AM
I don’t think it’s a current piccie of Bozzy either. Would our Boz wear a plastic bracelet? Nevah. Nevah. And that choker? Nevah. Hey, wait, I have that Longchamps bag! Whoever it is has great taste in totes.
July 10, 2008 at 12:35 PM
Konst: You got to the point real quick.
SadieJo: Jee Jee! Yeah I don’t know about the choker either. I just don’t see Bozzers’ essence in this woman. That said, who the eph is she and why the eph is her ass getting papped like this?
Malantha: You are the sweetest slag in the world. Thank you!
AC: How is it humanly possible that you don’t care whether or not Pete Dirtyho and the Katers Moss get back together again?!
Seriously, I don’t mind your unique brand of commenting. Your last sentence to Jane was a tad snotty, though.
July 17, 2008 at 4:45 PM
Whoever it is they have Boz style ears.